The Obama administration is asking a judge to reject a Minnesota woman's argument that a jury verdict ordering her to pay $1.92 million for sharing 24 tracks is unconstitutional.
"Defendant's suggestion that the actual harm can be measured to the 'tune of $1.29 for each of the 24 songs' ... ignores the potential multiplying effect of peer-to-peer file-sharing," the Department of Justice argues in papers filed today with a federal district court in Minnesota.
In June, a jury found that Jammie Thomas-Rasset willfully infringed on the record labels' copyright by sharing tracks on Kazza and ordered her to pay $80,000 per track. The copyright statute provides for damages between $750 and $150,000 per infringement.
Speechless.
Read More: http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=111705
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am just curious as to what constitutional ground she could argue? Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
ReplyDelete